July 24, 2003

provincial musings

As the result of some playful commentary over on Desiderata, I've been trying to come to terms with the concepts of Northern and Southern California, as opposed to the mythical states of North and South California. It's all just a matter of physical, cultural, and political geography. Objectively, splitting the state in half physically would involve drawing a line west to east beginning somewhere around Monterey on the coast over through Clovis and on to the Nevada border near Death Valley somewhere west of Beatty. AJ, up in Chico, thinks that Northern California ends somewhere north of Sonoma county. Another concept thrown around was Central California. This would run north from Sonoma county down south to San Luis Obispo. There are even some people up in the Far North have kept the idea of a separate state alive. I always felt that while Del Norte and Siskiyou had more to do with Southern Oregon than California, Modoc had closer ties to Northwestern Nevada. Back in the '60s, state senator Richard Dolwig of San Mateo, introduced a bill to split the state in two, with South California being those counties south of the Tehachapi mountains. I suppose we could just succeed from the Union and reconstitute the Bear Flag Republic. Being a Sonoman, I'd approve of that. Meanwhile, politically, now we have to vote on whether or not we want the sitting governor to remain sitting.

[Addendum 07/27/03: Ernie, over at little. yellow different. has a whole different take on the whole North-South California thing vis-a-vis the Bay Area. Good Old Gold Mountain / Saint Francis; brittle, brittle. As for famous Oaklanders there's, of course, no-there-there, Dirty Gurdy Stein. via Chicken or Beef?]

Posted by jim at July 24, 2003 12:49 PM | TrackBack
Comments

It's all about the water from the Hetch Hetchy, isn't it? The North has it, the South guzzles it.

Posted by: blogal villager on July 26, 2003 07:24 AM

Water is one of the limited resources, I'm sure. People (or votes) is another. Then there's industrial, agricultural (legal or not), touristic, etc., resources to consider. As I think about it more, the regions in California that are most helpful to me are: Up North (those counties close to the Oregon border) which doesn't include Sonoma or Napa counties, but does include Mendocino and Humboldt; the Central Valley from Chico or there abouts down to the Tehachapis; Down South / SoCal, or just plain LA; the Bay Area, a bunch of counties clustered around San Francisco. There's also some strange little enclaves, like Santa Cruz, the Sierran foothills (e.g., up around Grass Valley, down by Yosemite), and the other side of the Sierras. There's room for lots of gerrymandering.

Posted by: jim on July 26, 2003 12:11 PM
Post a comment