I’ve run across some interesting photographs in the past day or two:
[Addendum: Sorry about the gender confusion. Bee is a he not a she.]
Posted by jim at June 10, 2004 01:31 PM | TrackBackthe Prokudin-Gorskii pictures are fabulous. thanks for sharing.
Posted by: etaoin on June 10, 2004 04:07 PMNow I always thought Bee Flowers was a she, but, if you read his autobiography, she's a he. How about that. I guess I just ASSUMED "Bee" was short for "Bea". Zoing! Its like coming home and finding the whole house has been painted a new color!
Sorry for the confusion, Uncle.
Posted by: Richard Friedman on June 10, 2004 07:10 PMI was just thinking of the Prokudin-Gorskii pictures yesterday, and wondering where I'd put the link. Thanks for bringing them up ;)
As for the Bee Flowers photos... I don't really get it.
Posted by: Justin on June 12, 2004 06:19 PMJustin: oh, I don't know. Some of the old clocks, phones, and wall textures ones are kind of nice, don't you think?
Posted by: jim on June 12, 2004 06:46 PMI'm not saying the pictures are unpleasing, I just mean I don't understand your description of the concept (nor did I find the page where he explains it)
Posted by: Justin on June 16, 2004 01:19 PMSorry, Justin. He took three or more photos of the same scene but exposed them using different f-stops. Then he combined the photos in Photoshop, each as a different layer, and compositing them in such a way that the single, resulting picture uses different sections of an underlying photo. Sort of like burning in areas, when making a paper photo on an enlarger, by covering parts of the paper when exposing it. Basically different parts of the photo have been exposed differently. Hope this makes sense.
Posted by: jim on June 16, 2004 01:38 PM